Lawyers for Doctors, California Lawyers,California Medical Board Attorney,Lawyer for Medical Residents,Health Insurance Fraud Attorney,Nursing Board Sanction Lawyer,Law Offices for Doctors
M.D. CHRONICLE ORDER SHEETDIAGNOSISM.D. CHRONICLE SEARCH PAGECONTACT M.D. CHRONICLEM.D. CHRONICLE FORUMM.D. CHRONICLE SITE MAPDIET & ADLS: VITAL SIGNSCCU CONSULTWET ON DRYTYPE & CROSS MATCHEVENTSSTAT LEGAL CONSULT

CBC UR IN ANALYSIS

                                     

                           gavel.png

 

                                                         

 

1.     Consult Business Corner

2.     U aRe IN Analysis

 

This page is for provisions of law and regulations, cases and statutes, rules and court decisions, and Business venture news and any material information relevant to Medical Care providers. The title "U R in Analysis" is taken from famous laboratory work and hence, showing medical care providers' issues under the microscope of legislators and public. We will try to bring you interesting Medical court decisions and judgments in this page.   

 

SEE BELOW IF YOU DO NOT BELIEVE DOCTORS ARE UNDER STRICT SCRUTINY. STAY ON THE SIDE OF HONESTY AND ETHICS

 

 

 

 

 IF YOU ARE BILLING MEDICAL[MEDICAID] AND MEDICARE, READ BELOW

 

Fraud and Abuse Statutes

·                                 Federal Civil Monetary Penalties

·                                 Anti-Kickback Statute

·                                 Stark I, II

·                                 Federal Civil False Claims Act

Health Care Program Administration Statutes

·                                 Exclusion from Federal Health Care Programs

·                                 Fraud and Abuse Control Program

·                                 Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Account

·                                 Medicare Integrity Program

·                                 Beneficiary Incentive Programs

·                                 Safe Harbors; Advisory Opinions; Fraud Alerts

HIPAA Criminal Statutes

·                                 Health Care Fraud and Abuse Data Collection Program

·                                 Health Care Fraud and Scheme

·                                 Theft or Embezzlement in Connection with Health Care Benefit Program

·                                 Obstruction of Criminal Investigations of Health Care Offenses

·                                 False Statements Relating to Health Care Matters

Fraud and Abuse Statutes

Federal Civil Monetary Penalties (Section 1128A of the Social Security Act/42 USC 1320a-7aa). Health care professionals and entities are prohibited from presenting or causing to be presented claims for services that the individual or entity "knows or should know" were not provided as claimed. This provision applies to persons or entities that know or should know that the claims are false or fraudulent, and it prohibits anyone from providing false or misleading information on coverage that could reasonably be expected to influence a decision regarding when to discharge a person from inpatient hospital services. Civil monetary penalties (CMPs) may be applied in situations where the service was not provided as claimed or where the service was provided during a period in which the professional or entity was excluded from the program. Violation may result CMPs of up to $10,000 per claim, or $15,000 for each individual with respect to whom false or misleading information was given, and assessment payments (with part going for restitution) of up to three times the amount claimed. Physicians who certify the need for home health services and who know that all of the requirements for this care are not met, are subject to CMPs of not more than the greater of $5,000 or three times the amount of payments for services that are made pursuant to the certification. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Public Law 104-191 (HIPAA), clarified that the term "should know" includes, with respect to information set out in a claim, "acts in deliberate ignorance" or in "reckless disregard of the truth or falsity" and "no proof of specific intent to defraud is required."

"Anti-Kickback" law/Criminal Penalties for Acts Involving Federal Health Care Programs (Section 1128B of the Social Security Act/42 USC 1320a-7b). Individuals and entities are prohibited from "knowingly and willfully" making false statements or representations in applying for benefits or payments under all federal and state health care programs. Individuals also are prohibited from fraudulently concealing or failing to disclose knowledge of an event relating to an initial or continued right to benefits or payments. There is also a prohibition against knowingly and willfully soliciting or receiving any remuneration (including any kickbacks, bribe or rebate) directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind in exchange for referrals; or in return for purchasing, leasing, ordering, or arranging for or recommending purchasing, leasing, or ordering any good, facility, service, or item for which payment may be made in whole or in part under a Federal health care program. Violations may result in a felony conviction, with penalties including imprisonment for up to five years and a fine of up to $25,000. (Related safe harbor regulations define payment practices that are not within the meaning of prohibited "remuneration." The regulations provide immunity from criminal prosecution and civil exclusion for payment practices that fall within the safe harbor. Failure to fall within a safe harbor, however, does not mean that a payment arrangement necessarily violates the statute. Current safe harbors address: investment interests; space rental; equipment rental; personal services and management contracts; practice sale; referral services; warranties; discounts; employment relationships; waiver of co-insurance and deductible amounts; group purchasing organizations; increased coverage or reduced cost sharing under a risk-basis or prepaid plan; and charge reduction agreements with health plans.)

"Stark I, II"/Self-Referral Law/Limitations on Certain Physician Referrals (Section 1877 of the Social Security Act/42 USC 1395nn). "Stark I" became effective in 1995 and prevents physicians and their immediate family members who have an ownership or compensation relationship with a clinical laboratory services facility from making referrals to it. "Stark II" is broader, preventing physicians and immediate family members who have an ownership or compensation relationship with an entity providing "designated health services" from referring patients for these services where payment may be made under Medicare. An entity providing a designated health service is prohibited from billing for the provision of a service based on a prohibited referral. Designated health service includes: clinical laboratory services; physical therapy services; occupational therapy services; radiology services, including magnetic resonance imaging, computerized axial tomography scans, and ultrasound services; radiation therapy services and supplies; durable medical equipment and supplies; parenteral and enteral nutrients, equipment and supplies; prosthetics, orthotics, prosthetic devices and supplies; home health services; outpatient prescription drugs; and inpatient and outpatient hospital services. Penalties for violation of this provision include denial of payment for the designated health services, refund of amounts collected in violation of the provision and CMPs of up to $15,000 for each service. Physicians and entities that enter into an arrangement to circumvent the referral restriction law shall be subject to a CMP of up to $100,000 per occurrence. There are numerous exceptions to this provision, including: personally providing or supervising the provision of the service; in-office ancillary services provided by the physician or another physician or an employee in the same group practice; and referrals through a prepaid health plan.

Federal Civil False Claims Act (31 USC 3829-3733). The Act imposes liability upon anyone who knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false record or statement to get a false or fraudulent claim paid or approved by the Government. Depending on the applicable part of the statute, a false statement may or may not be necessary on the claim submitted to the Government for payment for liability.

Health Care Program Administration Statutes

Exclusion from Federal Health Care Programs (Section 1128(a),(b) and (c) of the Social Security Act/42 USC 1320a-7a). Individuals or entities convicted for a program related crime, a criminal offense relating to patient abuse or neglect, a felony offense related to health care fraud, or a felony offense related to controlled substances must be excluded from Medicare and Medicaid for a minimum of 5 years. If there is one prior conviction, the exclusion will be for 10 years, and the exclusion will be permanent where there are two prior convictions. Exclusion will be discretionary only for misdemeanor health care fraud and controlled substance offenses and for criminal offenses related to fraud, theft, embezzlement, breach of fiduciary responsibility, or other financial misconduct in non-health care government programs. Discretionary exclusions also are authorized for: license revocation or suspension; exclusion or suspension from a federal or state health care program; excessive charges or the provision of medically unnecessary services; and failure to provide required information. The minimum period of discretionary exclusion would be three years, unless the Secretary of the federal Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) determines (pursuant to regulations) that a longer or shorter period is appropriate.

Fraud and Abuse Control Program (Section 1128C of the Social Security Act/42 USC 1320a-7c). Authorized HHS, acting through the HHS Office of the Inspector General (OIG), and the Department of Justice (DOJ) to design, implement and coordinate the federal Fraud and Abuse Control Program. The purpose of the program is to: coordinate Federal, State, and local law enforcement programs to control fraud and abuse in health plans; conduct investigations, audits, evaluations, and inspections relating to the delivery of and payment for health care; facilitate the enforcement of health care fraud and abuse laws; issue advisory opinions and special fraud alerts; and provide for the reporting and disclosure of "final adverse actions" against health care professionals, providers, or suppliers. HHS and DOJ are to issue guidelines concerning the provision of information to carry out the program from health plans, health care professionals and entities.

Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Account (Section 1817 of the Social Security Act/42 USC 1395i(k)). HIPAA established the Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Account within the Medicare Part A Trust Fund to fund HHS and DOJ (including the Federal Bureau of Investigation) activities relating to the costs of administration and operation of the health care fraud and abuse control program. In addition to federal appropriations, the fund will receive a portion of funds collected from health care fraud and abuse penalties and fines. Annual authorizations for this fund grow from $104,000,000 in fiscal year 1997 to $240,558,320 in fiscal years 2004 and beyond. From the Account, funding for the HHS OIG is authorized to grow from between $60,000,000 and $70,000,000 in fiscal year 1997 to between $150,000,000 and $160,000,000 in fiscal years 2003 and beyond. (HIPAA also authorized funds for the FBI from general revenues to combat health care fraud and abuse. This funding is scheduled to grow from $47,000,000 in fiscal year 1997 to $114,000,000 in fiscal years 2003 and beyond.)

Medicare Integrity Program (Section 1893 of the Social Security Act/45 USC 1395ddd). HHS is authorized to contract with private organizations to: review the activities (including utilization and fraud review) of health care professionals and entities providing services for which payment may be made; audit cost reports; determine whether a Medicare payment should have been made and initiate recovery of Medicare payments that should not have been made pursuant to Medicare secondary payer requirements; educate individuals and entities with respect to payment integrity and benefit quality assurance issues; and develop and periodically update a list of items of durable medical equipment subject to prior authorization. (Medicare carriers and fiscal intermediaries will no longer perform these functions in areas where there is a Medicare Integrity Program contract.) Funds also were authorized (pursuant to HIPAA) from the Part A Trust fund to the Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Account for the Medicare Integrity Program. This funding is scheduled to grow from between $430,000,000 and $440,000,000 in fiscal year 1997 to between $710,000,000 and $720,000,000 in fiscal years 2003 and beyond.

Beneficiary Incentive Programs (Section 203 of HIPAA/42 USC 1395b-5). HHS is to establish a program to encourage individuals to report information on health care professionals and entities they suspect to be engaging in or who have engaged in acts or omissions that may constitute fraud or abuse against the Medicare program. Where a beneficiary reports information that serves as the basis for the collection of at least $100, a portion of the amount collected may be paid to the individual.

Safe Harbors; Advisory Opinions; Fraud Alerts (Section 1128D of the Social Security Act/42 USC 1320a-7d). HHS is to solicit proposals annually on modifications to existing as well as new safe harbors. Health care professionals, entities, or health plans may request an advisory opinion from HHS, acting in consultation with DOJ, on the following issues: what constitutes prohibited "remuneration" or payment under the Anti-kickback statute; whether the arrangement or proposed arrangement is prohibited remuneration; whether an arrangement or proposed arrangement is not prohibited remuneration; what constitutes an inducement to reduce or limit services to Medicare/Medicaid beneficiaries; and whether any activity or proposed activity constitutes grounds for the imposition of fraud and abuse sanctions. Advisory opinions will not be issued on questions of fair market value or whether an individual is a bona fide employee. Advisory opinions will be binding on the requesting party and HHS. Failure to seek an advisory opinion is not admissible as evidence of intent to violate the law. Individuals may request that the HHS OIG issue fraud alerts which will inform the public of practices that the OIG considers to be suspect. The OIG is to investigate to determine whether a fraud alert is warranted. Fraud alerts will be issued through the Federal Register.

HIPAA Criminal Statutes (crimes created by HIPAA but not specific to HIPAA)

Health Care Fraud and Abuse Data Collection Program (Section 1128E of the Social Security Act/42 USC 1320a-7c). A central health care fraud and abuse database is established for the reporting of final adverse actions (not including malpractice claims and settlements in which no findings of liability have been made) against health care professionals, providers, and suppliers. HHS is to establish procedures to address disputed accuracy of information. Information from the database will be available to government agencies and health plans.

Health Care Fraud and Scheme (18 USC 1347). Prohibits knowing and willful actions or attempts to execute a scheme to defraud any health care benefit program or to obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretense, representation, or promises, any of the money or property owned by, or under the custody or control of any health benefit program. Potential penalties include fines and imprisonment for up to 10 years. Imprisonment may be for up to 20 years if the offense causes serious bodily injury and up to life imprisonment if the offense causes death.

Theft or Embezzlement in Connection with Health Care Benefit Program (18 USC 669). Prohibits knowingly and willfully embezzling, stealing, or otherwise without authority converting or intentionally misapplying money or property of a health care benefit program. Potential penalties include fines and imprisonment for up to 10 years. Where the value of the property at issue is $100 or less, maximum imprisonment will be for one year.

Obstruction of Criminal Investigations of Health Care Offenses (18 USC 1518). Anyone who willfully prevents, obstructs, misleads, or delays or attempts to prevent the communication of information or records relating to a violation of a federal health care offense to a criminal investigator may face fines and up to five years imprisonment.

False Statements Relating to Health Care Matters (18 USC 1035). Anyone who knowingly and willfully falsifies or conceals a material fact or makes a materially false fictitious or fraudulent statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for health care benefits, items or services may face fines and up to five years imprisonment.

YOU MAY SAY YOU ARE BOARD CERTIFIED BY AMERICAN BOARD OF COSMETIC SURGERY                                                                                      A California Superior Court judge recently ordered the Medical Board of California to grant specialty board equivalency status to the American Board of Cosmetic Surgery (ABCS). The court determined that ABCS’s requirements for board certification meet or exceed the training requirements of the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS).

State law allows physicians to advertise board certification only if the certifying board or association is recognized by ABMS or deemed equivalent by the medical board. This decision will allow California physicians who are ABCS certified to advertise that they are board certified in cosmetic surgery. The medical board, which had previously denied ABCS’s petition for equivalency, has not yet decided whether it will appeal the ruling.

The only other boards currently deemed equivalent by the medical board are the American Board of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, the American Board of Pain Medicine, the American Board of Sleep Medicine, and the American Board of Spine Surgery. The only other board that applied for and was denied approval by the medical board is the American Academy of Pain Management. The academy unsuccessfully sued the medical board a number of times in the late 1990s, challenging the CMA-sponsored law passed in 1990 that authorized the Medical Board of California to regulate physicians’ use of the term “board certified” for advertising purposes.

The 1990 law was passed in response to complaints that physicians were advertising themselves as “board certified” when they had only attended very brief courses offered by non-ABMS boards. Even though American Academy of Pain Management failed to meet the medical board’s equivalency standards, the academy argued that the law violates the First Amendment right to free speech. In 2004, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the statute.

 

ANOTHER PROBLEM FOR DOCTORS

A Moreno Valley doctor accused of sexually abusing inmates at the California Institution for Women has been suspended from practicing medicine for 30 days and placed on five years' probation.

Dr. Nizar Isa Ibrahim worked at the Chino prison for about three years until leaving in July 2003.

According to information from the Medical Board of California, Ibrahim was terminated from the prison, but later was allowed to resign as part of a settlement of his personnel case. The prison employs five medical doctors and eight psychiatrists, a prison spokesman said.

The medical board accused Ibrahim of touching or grabbing the breasts of two female inmates who had come to him for treatment of asthma and high blood pressure.

Ibrahim also was accused of unprofessional conduct such as using profanity and making sexually suggestive comments while talking with inmates and staff, according to state records.

Neither Ibrahim, whose suspension began in early September, nor his Santa Monica attorney returned phone calls seeking comment.

State Prison Health System

California's prison health system has been under fire for years because of allegations about shoddy care, patient neglect, filthy examination rooms, careless procedures, overworked staff and bottom-of-the-barrel physician hires.

By the prison system's own account, about 20 percent of its doctors have some kind of blemish on their records, such as a malpractice lawsuit, criminal charges or privileges revoked by a hospital.

A federal judge in July ordered that a receiver be appointed to run the prison health system after the state failed to make promised improvements.

 

 

ANOTHER PHYSICIAN ACCUSED AND DISCIPLINED

Facing a formal Accusation of unprofessional conduct before the Medical Board of California, Fullerton physician Harley Sterling, M.D. has surrendered his license to practice medicine. The stipulated surrender of his medical license was accepted by the board on March 14, 2005 and became effective on March 21, 2005.

In a November 1999 First Amended Accusation, the board accused Sterling of violating multiple sections of the Business and Professions Code, including section 2234(b)(c) (d) (gross negligence, repeated negligent acts, and incompetence) in his care and treatment of two patients. One patient, while under his care, underwent approximately 32 procedures on her breasts. During all surgical procedures performed which involved injection of saline or silicone gel into intact breast implants, Sterling directly punctured with a syringe needle the outer shell of the silicone implants, thereby causing leakage of implant material into the surrounding tissue. He also augmented the volume of the implants with saline or silicone gel, although it was never intended by implant manufacturers and was clearly prohibited by the federal Food and Drug Administration. On a second patient, Sterling used a homemade "nutcracker" device (consisting of two ax handles connected by a small metal bar at the top) to perform a closed capsulotomy. This procedure is commonly performed to breakup the fibrous scar capsule around the implant. Sterling failed to explain to the patient the potential risks and complications from using the device, did not obtain verbal or written approval from the patient, and failed to provide appropriate follow-up care to ensure no complications occurred from using this device.

Pursuant to a Stipulated Settlement and Disciplinary Order in May 2000, the board placed Sterling on five years' probation for unprofessional conduct. During the term of probation, he was required to comply with the board's Probation Surveillance Program along with terms and conditions, some of which included: enrolling in and completing the full Physician Assessment and Clinical Education Program (PACE) at the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine and undergo assessment, clinical training and examination with a focus, where possible, on plastic and reconstructive surgery, within 90 days; on an annual basis thereafter for each year of probation, submitting to the board an educational program or course not less than 40 hours per year; enrolling and passing a board-approved ethics course; having a practice monitor for the first two years of probation; obeying all federal, state and local laws, all rules governing the practice of medicine in California, and remaining in full compliance with any court-ordered criminal probation, payments and orders; submitting quarterly reports advising of his compliance with his probation and any court-ordered probation; and appearing in person for interviews with the board.

Sterling's probation was subject to revocation for failing to obey all laws, submit quarterly reports to the board, pay cost recovery to the board for investigative and prosecution costs as well as the costs associated with probation monitoring. In addition, Sterling was subject to discipline for performing surgeries in an outpatient center without a transfer agreement and without admitting privileges at a local licensed acute care hospital. According to Sterling's own surgical records, he performed over 100 surgical procedures in his outpatient surgery center between January 6, 2003 and August 26, 2003 without the required transfer arrangement and without the required liability insurance coverage for malpractice claims.

CALIFORNIA DOCTOR SURRENDERED MEDICAL LICENSE

Facing formal Accusations of wrongdoing by the Medical Board of California, San Diego physician Egisto Salerno, M.D. has surrendered his license to practice medicine. The stipulated surrender of his medical license is effective on April 29, 2003.

Salerno was placed by the Medical Board on two years' probation beginning June 18, 2001 for an assessment and plan for a patient inconsistent with the patient's records, which he had not signed; for inadequate follow-up with the patient; for not being truthful at his interviews with Medical Board staff; and because he admitted to lying to the city attorney and to the police who were investigating the patient.

On April 22, 2002 Salerno was arrested for being under the influence of cocaine; chasing non-existent people with a loaded weapon and threatening to kill his wife. When arrested, he had a baggie of cocaine in his underwear, and additional cocaine and marijuana were found in other places in his home. He admitted to using the cocaine that day. Police officers also found numerous unregistered weapons and 300 rounds of ammunition in his home.

As a result of the felony charges stemming from Salerno's arrest, on May 22, 2002 he agreed with the Board to accept a full temporary restraining order that prohibited him from any medical practice. The Board filed an Accusation and Petition to Revoke his probation on June 13, 2002. His surrender of his medical license constitutes the conclusion of this case.

LICENSED TO KILL

A man currently serving a 12?-year sentence for impersonating a physician was sentenced this morning to an additional 120 months in federal prison for posing as a doctor after escaping from prison in 2000.

Gerald Barnes, 70, was sentenced on his fifth conviction of impersonating a doctor. The 10-year sentence imposed by United States District Judge J. Spencer Letts in Los Angeles will run consecutive to both the 12?-year sentence and a separate, previously imposed 2?-year sentence for the escape. The prior sentences are not due to expire until June 2009.

Barnes, who was born Gerald Barnbaum, claims to have legally changed his name in the 1970s to Gerald Barnes, the name of a licensed physician who was practicing in Stockton, California. After obtaining copies of Dr. Barnes' school records and medical credentials, the fake Dr. Barnes used the documents to obtain employment at numerous medical clinics and offices in Southern California.

As part of today's sentencing, Judge Letts ordered the defendant to stop using the name of Gerald Barnes, finding no evidence that the defendant had ever legally adopted that name.

Barnes pleaded guilty in 1981 to involuntary manslaughter in connection with the death of a 29-year-old patient who died of complications from diabetes after being misdiagnosed by Barnes. He was convicted again in 1984 and 1989 on state charges of grand theft and writing fraudulent prescriptions. Upon each release from prison, Barnes resumed his impersonation of Dr. Barnes.

PHYSICIAN IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW MAY BE SENTENCED TO 598 YEARS IN PRISON 2/10/05

The federal jury convicted Dr. Rafil Dhafir of conspiring to violate the embargo, money laundering, tax evasion and Medicare fraud after a trial that lasted more than three months. Dhafir, an oncologist, was acquitted on one of the 11 counts of money laundering.

Defense attorney Deveraux Cannick said Dhafir was the victim of post-Sept. 11 anti-Muslim sentiment. "If he were not a Muslim, he never would have been charged or brought to trial," the attorney said.

Dhafir founded Help The Needy in 1995 and solicited donations to help starving and oppressed Iraqis. The charity was never properly licensed, and the government says only about $160,000 made it to Iraq (news - web sites).

The government says the charity transferred nearly $4 million from its U.S. bank accounts to a bank in Jordan under the name of Maher Zagha, one of the Help the Needy members charged with Dhafir. Zagha remains a fugitive.

The government said Dhafir defrauded donors by using $544,000 for his own purposes, including buying two coin-operated laundries, and he evaded taxes by writing off the charity's donations.

His defense attorneys argued that Dhafir believed humanitarian aid to Iraq was legal, and that while he mixed charity money with his own, he never used donations for personal expenses.

The attorneys also said Dhafir got caught up in difficult rules governing Medicare and his mistakes were not crimes.

Dhafir was arrested in February 2003 in a high-profile raid at his home and labeled a suspected terrorist by U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft (news - web sites). The government later backed away from that claim but kept Dhafir imprisoned for more than 20 months while awaiting trial.

Five people, including Dhafir's wife, have pleaded guilty to charges related to the case.

Dhafir, 57, will be sentenced June 20. If given the maximum penalty on each count, Dhafir would face up to 598 years in prison and fines totaling $23.5 million.

Former Clinic CEO Sentenced for Tax Evasion
On December 17, US Attorney McGregor W. Scott announced that Osa Marie Healy, was sentenced to a one year and one day jail term for filing false tax returns which falsely omitted some $90,000 of income which she had embezzled from the Redwood Family Clinic, a Vallejo-based health care clinic.

Former Administrator Charged with Fraud
On December 15, the US Attorney's Office for the Northern District of California announced that a federal grand jury in San Jose has indicted Neil Philip McArthur on three counts of Medicare fraud. Mr. McArthur was charged with defrauding Medicare of over $800,000 between January 1, 1998 and January 10, 2000. During this time, he was employed by the Monterey Family Practice Medical Center (MFP) and Alpha Healthcare Management Services (Alpha) in Monterey, California. McArthur is charged with 1) conspiracy to commit health care fraud, 2) health care fraud, and 3) making a false statement pertaining to health care fraud. 

Yedid Confined
On November 24, US Attorney for the Southern District of California Carol C. Lam announced that Dr. Joseph Yedid, a San Diego psychologist, was sentenced to six months of home confinement, 250 hours of community service, and three years of supervised release, as well as pay at $10,000 fine and over $37,000 restitution for submitting false billings to Medicare.

FL Pain Clinic Manager Charged
On December 13, US Attorney for the Southern District of Florida Marcos Daniel Jiménez and Robert J. Joura, Acting Special Agent in Charge, United States Drug Enforcement Administration, announced the recent filing of criminal charges against defendant, Mark Gusow, related to a conspiracy to distribute and dispense Oxycodone, including OxyContin, through the Boca Raton Community Pain Center.

Med-Con Owner Sentenced
On December 15, US Attorney for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Gregory F. Van Tatenhove, announced that John Shaw, the owner and operator of Med-Con, an oxygen supply business which receives payments from Medicare for furnishing oxygen to approved patients, was sentenced to a period of six months home confinement, and ordered to pay restitution in the sum of $354,000 to Medicare.

In September of 2004, Mr. Shaw entered a plea of guilty to ten counts of making kickbacks to a doctor and two of his associates for falsifying oxygen tests results on patients and for referring those same patients to Med-Con, John Shaw's business. The doctor, who is no longer in practice, maintained an office in Martin, Kentucky. During 2000 and 2001, the kickbacks totaled $73,130.00.

Pair Charged with Fraud
On December 15, US Attorney Michael Shelby announced the indictment of Brenda Franklin Harris, 58, and Rosalind Michelle Jones, 38, of Baytown, Texas, the owners of Health Universal Medical Services. They are charged with conspiracy, wire fraud, and health care fraud as a result of a scheme to defraud Medicare of millions of dollars by filing false and fraudulent claims.

TX Cardiologist Indicted
On December 16, US Attorney for the Western District of Texas Johnny Sutton announced the arrest and indictment of Dr. Piyush V. Patel, a cardiologist and owner of Heart Place Hospital in Midland and his wife, Dr. Meenakshi P. Patel, a Midland psychiatrist, for conspiring to defraud Medicare, Medicaid, and Federal Employees Health Benefit Plan.

Disciplinary News by AP

Oakland, California-AP -- A California doctor who's written 75-hundred recommendations for medical use of marijuana could be in trouble.

The Medical Board of California is trying to revoke or suspend Doctor Tod Mikuriya's (mee-koo-REE'-yuhz) license.

The licensing board says the issue is not pot itself -- but rather making the recommendation without doing sufficient medical exams or keeping proper records.

Mikuriya has been a vocal advocate of medical marijuana for years. He and his supporters view the accusation as a political attempt to silence him. One says it's all having a "chilling" effect.

Doctors are allowed to recommend marijuana in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Nevada, Oregon and Washington.

The Bush administration is aiming to smoke out doctors who recommend pot and have them punished.

 doctor@lawprn.com

 310.804.5225

 

 

 

 

 

British American Legal Council.

 


Home Page | About Us | Search | Contact Us | Services | Site Map | DIET & ADLS: AS TOLERATED | VITAL SIGNS | CCU CONSULT | WET ON DRY | TYPE & CROSS MATCH, 2 U | Events | STAT LEGAL CONSULT