|

1.
Consult Business Corner
2. U aRe IN
Analysis
This
page is for provisions of law and regulations, cases and statutes,
rules and court decisions, and Business venture news and any
material information relevant to Medical Care providers. The title
"U R in Analysis" is taken from famous laboratory work and hence,
showing medical care providers' issues under the microscope of
legislators and public. We will try to bring you interesting Medical
court decisions and judgments in this
page.
SEE BELOW IF YOU DO NOT BELIEVE
DOCTORS ARE UNDER STRICT SCRUTINY. STAY ON THE SIDE OF HONESTY AND
ETHICS
IF YOU ARE BILLING MEDICAL[MEDICAID] AND
MEDICARE, READ BELOW
Fraud and Abuse Statutes
·
Federal Civil Monetary Penalties
·
Anti-Kickback Statute
·
Stark I, II
·
Federal Civil False Claims Act
Health Care Program Administration
Statutes
·
Exclusion from Federal Health Care
Programs
·
Fraud and Abuse Control Program
·
Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control
Account
·
Medicare Integrity Program
·
Beneficiary Incentive Programs
·
Safe Harbors; Advisory Opinions; Fraud
Alerts
HIPAA Criminal
Statutes
·
Health Care Fraud and Abuse Data Collection
Program
·
Health Care Fraud and Scheme
·
Theft or Embezzlement in Connection with
Health Care Benefit Program
·
Obstruction of Criminal Investigations of
Health Care Offenses
·
False Statements Relating to Health Care
Matters
Fraud and
Abuse Statutes
Federal
Civil Monetary Penalties (Section 1128A of the Social Security
Act/42 USC 1320a-7aa). Health
care professionals and entities are prohibited from presenting or
causing to be presented claims for services that the individual or
entity "knows or should know" were not provided as claimed. This
provision applies to persons or entities that know or should know
that the claims are false or fraudulent, and it prohibits anyone
from providing false or misleading information on coverage that
could reasonably be expected to influence a decision regarding when
to discharge a person from inpatient hospital services. Civil
monetary penalties (CMPs) may be applied in situations where the
service was not provided as claimed or where the service was
provided during a period in which the professional or entity was
excluded from the program. Violation may result CMPs of up to
$10,000 per claim, or $15,000 for each individual with respect to
whom false or misleading information was given, and assessment
payments (with part going for restitution) of up to three times the
amount claimed. Physicians who certify the need for home health
services and who know that all of the requirements for this care are
not met, are subject to CMPs of not more than the greater of $5,000
or three times the amount of payments for services that are made
pursuant to the certification. The Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996, Public Law 104-191 (HIPAA), clarified
that the term "should know" includes, with respect to information
set out in a claim, "acts in deliberate ignorance" or in "reckless
disregard of the truth or falsity" and "no proof of specific intent
to defraud is required."
"Anti-Kickback" law/Criminal
Penalties for Acts Involving Federal Health Care Programs (Section
1128B of the Social Security Act/42 USC 1320a-7b).
Individuals and entities are prohibited from "knowingly and
willfully" making false statements or representations in applying
for benefits or payments under all federal and state health care
programs. Individuals also are prohibited from fraudulently
concealing or failing to disclose knowledge of an event relating to
an initial or continued right to benefits or payments. There is also
a prohibition against knowingly and willfully soliciting or
receiving any remuneration (including any kickbacks, bribe or
rebate) directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind in exchange for
referrals; or in return for purchasing, leasing, ordering, or
arranging for or recommending purchasing, leasing, or ordering any
good, facility, service, or item for which payment may be made in
whole or in part under a Federal health care program. Violations may
result in a felony conviction, with penalties including imprisonment
for up to five years and a fine of up to $25,000. (Related safe
harbor regulations define payment practices that are not within the
meaning of prohibited "remuneration." The regulations provide
immunity from criminal prosecution and civil exclusion for payment
practices that fall within the safe harbor. Failure to fall within a
safe harbor, however, does not mean that a payment arrangement
necessarily violates the statute. Current safe harbors address:
investment interests; space rental; equipment rental; personal
services and management contracts; practice sale; referral services;
warranties; discounts; employment relationships; waiver of
co-insurance and deductible amounts; group purchasing organizations;
increased coverage or reduced cost sharing under a risk-basis or
prepaid plan; and charge reduction agreements with health
plans.)
"Stark I, II"/Self-Referral Law/Limitations
on Certain Physician Referrals (Section 1877 of the Social Security
Act/42 USC 1395nn). "Stark
I" became effective in 1995 and prevents physicians and their
immediate family members who have an ownership or compensation
relationship with a clinical laboratory services facility from
making referrals to it. "Stark II" is broader, preventing physicians
and immediate family members who have an ownership or compensation
relationship with an entity providing "designated health services"
from referring patients for these services where payment may be made
under Medicare. An entity providing a designated health service is
prohibited from billing for the provision of a service based on a
prohibited referral. Designated health service includes: clinical
laboratory services; physical therapy services; occupational therapy
services; radiology services, including magnetic resonance imaging,
computerized axial tomography scans, and ultrasound services;
radiation therapy services and supplies; durable medical equipment
and supplies; parenteral and enteral nutrients, equipment and
supplies; prosthetics, orthotics, prosthetic devices and supplies;
home health services; outpatient prescription drugs; and inpatient
and outpatient hospital services. Penalties for violation of this
provision include denial of payment for the designated health
services, refund of amounts collected in violation of the provision
and CMPs of up to $15,000 for each service. Physicians and entities
that enter into an arrangement to circumvent the referral
restriction law shall be subject to a CMP of up to $100,000 per
occurrence. There are numerous exceptions to this provision,
including: personally providing or supervising the provision of the
service; in-office ancillary services provided by the physician or
another physician or an employee in the same group practice; and
referrals through a prepaid health plan.
Federal
Civil False Claims Act (31 USC 3829-3733). The Act
imposes liability upon anyone who knowingly makes, uses, or causes
to be made or used, a false record or statement to get a false or
fraudulent claim paid or approved by the Government. Depending on
the applicable part of the statute, a false statement may or may not
be necessary on the claim submitted to the Government for payment
for liability.
Health
Care Program Administration Statutes
Exclusion
from Federal Health Care Programs (Section 1128(a),(b) and (c) of
the Social Security Act/42 USC 1320a-7a).
Individuals or entities convicted for a program related crime, a
criminal offense relating to patient abuse or neglect, a felony
offense related to health care fraud, or a felony offense related to
controlled substances must be excluded from Medicare and Medicaid
for a minimum of 5 years. If there is one prior conviction, the
exclusion will be for 10 years, and the exclusion will be permanent
where there are two prior convictions. Exclusion will be
discretionary only for misdemeanor health care fraud and controlled
substance offenses and for criminal offenses related to fraud,
theft, embezzlement, breach of fiduciary responsibility, or other
financial misconduct in non-health care government programs.
Discretionary exclusions also are authorized for: license revocation
or suspension; exclusion or suspension from a federal or state
health care program; excessive charges or the provision of medically
unnecessary services; and failure to provide required information.
The minimum period of discretionary exclusion would be three years,
unless the Secretary of the federal Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) determines (pursuant to regulations) that a longer or
shorter period is appropriate.
Fraud and
Abuse Control Program (Section 1128C of the Social Security Act/42
USC 1320a-7c).
Authorized HHS, acting through the HHS Office of the Inspector
General (OIG), and the Department of Justice (DOJ) to design,
implement and coordinate the federal Fraud and Abuse Control
Program. The purpose of the program is to: coordinate Federal,
State, and local law enforcement programs to control fraud and abuse
in health plans; conduct investigations, audits, evaluations, and
inspections relating to the delivery of and payment for health care;
facilitate the enforcement of health care fraud and abuse laws;
issue advisory opinions and special fraud alerts; and provide for
the reporting and disclosure of "final adverse actions" against
health care professionals, providers, or suppliers. HHS and DOJ are
to issue guidelines concerning the provision of information to carry
out the program from health plans, health care professionals and
entities.
Health
Care Fraud and Abuse Control Account (Section 1817 of the Social
Security Act/42 USC 1395i(k)). HIPAA
established the Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Account within
the Medicare Part A Trust Fund to fund HHS and DOJ (including the
Federal Bureau of Investigation) activities relating to the costs of
administration and operation of the health care fraud and abuse
control program. In addition to federal appropriations, the fund
will receive a portion of funds collected from health care fraud and
abuse penalties and fines. Annual authorizations for this fund grow
from $104,000,000 in fiscal year 1997 to $240,558,320 in fiscal
years 2004 and beyond. From the Account, funding for the HHS OIG is
authorized to grow from between $60,000,000 and $70,000,000 in
fiscal year 1997 to between $150,000,000 and $160,000,000 in fiscal
years 2003 and beyond. (HIPAA also authorized funds for the FBI from
general revenues to combat health care fraud and abuse. This funding
is scheduled to grow from $47,000,000 in fiscal year 1997 to
$114,000,000 in fiscal years 2003 and beyond.)
Medicare
Integrity Program (Section 1893 of the Social Security Act/45 USC
1395ddd). HHS is
authorized to contract with private organizations to: review the
activities (including utilization and fraud review) of health care
professionals and entities providing services for which payment may
be made; audit cost reports; determine whether a Medicare payment
should have been made and initiate recovery of Medicare payments
that should not have been made pursuant to Medicare secondary payer
requirements; educate individuals and entities with respect to
payment integrity and benefit quality assurance issues; and develop
and periodically update a list of items of durable medical equipment
subject to prior authorization. (Medicare carriers and fiscal
intermediaries will no longer perform these functions in areas where
there is a Medicare Integrity Program contract.) Funds also were
authorized (pursuant to HIPAA) from the Part A Trust fund to the
Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Account for the Medicare
Integrity Program. This funding is scheduled to grow from between
$430,000,000 and $440,000,000 in fiscal year 1997 to between
$710,000,000 and $720,000,000 in fiscal years 2003 and
beyond.
Beneficiary
Incentive Programs (Section 203 of HIPAA/42 USC
1395b-5). HHS is
to establish a program to encourage individuals to report
information on health care professionals and entities they suspect
to be engaging in or who have engaged in acts or omissions that may
constitute fraud or abuse against the Medicare program. Where a
beneficiary reports information that serves as the basis for the
collection of at least $100, a portion of the amount collected may
be paid to the individual.
Safe
Harbors;
Advisory Opinions; Fraud Alerts (Section 1128D of the Social
Security Act/42 USC 1320a-7d). HHS is
to solicit proposals annually on modifications to existing as well
as new safe harbors. Health care professionals, entities, or health
plans may request an advisory opinion from HHS, acting in
consultation with DOJ, on the following issues: what constitutes
prohibited "remuneration" or payment under the Anti-kickback
statute; whether the arrangement or proposed arrangement is
prohibited remuneration; whether an arrangement or proposed
arrangement is not prohibited remuneration; what constitutes an
inducement to reduce or limit services to Medicare/Medicaid
beneficiaries; and whether any activity or proposed activity
constitutes grounds for the imposition of fraud and abuse sanctions.
Advisory opinions will not be issued on questions of fair market
value or whether an individual is a bona fide employee. Advisory
opinions will be binding on the requesting party and HHS. Failure to
seek an advisory opinion is not admissible as evidence of intent to
violate the law. Individuals may request that the HHS OIG issue
fraud alerts which will inform the public of practices that the OIG
considers to be suspect. The OIG is to investigate to determine
whether a fraud alert is warranted. Fraud alerts will be issued
through the Federal Register.
HIPAA
Criminal Statutes (crimes created by HIPAA but not specific to
HIPAA)
Health
Care Fraud and Abuse Data Collection Program (Section 1128E of the
Social Security Act/42 USC 1320a-7c). A
central health care fraud and abuse database is established for the
reporting of final adverse actions (not including malpractice claims
and settlements in which no findings of liability have been made)
against health care professionals, providers, and suppliers. HHS is
to establish procedures to address disputed accuracy of information.
Information from the database will be available to government
agencies and health plans.
Health
Care Fraud and Scheme (18 USC 1347).
Prohibits knowing and willful actions or attempts to execute a
scheme to defraud any health care benefit program or to obtain, by
means of false or fraudulent pretense, representation, or promises,
any of the money or property owned by, or under the custody or
control of any health benefit program. Potential penalties include
fines and imprisonment for up to 10 years. Imprisonment may be for
up to 20 years if the offense causes serious bodily injury and up to
life imprisonment if the offense causes death.
Theft or
Embezzlement in Connection with Health Care Benefit Program (18 USC
669).
Prohibits knowingly and willfully embezzling, stealing, or otherwise
without authority converting or intentionally misapplying money or
property of a health care benefit program. Potential penalties
include fines and imprisonment for up to 10 years. Where the value
of the property at issue is $100 or less, maximum imprisonment will
be for one year.
Obstruction
of Criminal Investigations of Health Care Offenses (18 USC
1518). Anyone
who willfully prevents, obstructs, misleads, or delays or attempts
to prevent the communication of information or records relating to a
violation of a federal health care offense to a criminal
investigator may face fines and up to five years
imprisonment.
False
Statements Relating to Health Care Matters (18 USC
1035). Anyone
who knowingly and willfully falsifies or conceals a material fact or
makes a materially false fictitious or fraudulent statement in
connection with the delivery of or payment for health care benefits,
items or services may face fines and up to five years
imprisonment.
YOU MAY SAY
YOU ARE BOARD CERTIFIED BY AMERICAN BOARD OF COSMETIC
SURGERY
A California Superior Court judge recently ordered the Medical Board of
California to grant specialty board
equivalency status to the American Board of
Cosmetic Surgery (ABCS). The court
determined that ABCS’s requirements for board certification meet or
exceed the training requirements of the American Board of
Medical Specialties
(ABMS).
State law allows physicians to
advertise board certification only if the certifying board or
association is recognized by ABMS or deemed equivalent by the
medical board. This decision will allow California physicians who
are ABCS certified to advertise that they are board certified in
cosmetic surgery. The medical board, which had previously denied
ABCS’s petition for equivalency, has not yet decided whether it will
appeal the ruling.
The only other boards currently
deemed equivalent by the medical board are the American Board of
Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, the American Board of
Pain Medicine, the American Board of Sleep Medicine, and the
American Board of Spine Surgery. The only other board that applied
for and was denied approval by the medical board is the American
Academy of Pain Management. The academy unsuccessfully sued the
medical board a number of times in the late 1990s, challenging the
CMA-sponsored law passed in 1990 that authorized the Medical Board
of California to regulate physicians’ use of the term “board
certified” for advertising purposes.
The 1990 law was passed in
response to complaints that physicians were advertising themselves
as “board certified” when they had only attended very brief courses
offered by non-ABMS boards. Even though American Academy of Pain
Management failed to meet the medical board’s equivalency standards,
the academy argued that the law violates the First Amendment right
to free speech. In 2004, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
upheld the
statute.
ANOTHER
PROBLEM FOR DOCTORS
A Moreno Valley doctor accused of
sexually abusing inmates at the California Institution for Women has
been suspended from practicing medicine for 30 days and placed on
five years' probation.
Dr.
Nizar Isa Ibrahim worked at the Chino prison for about three years
until leaving in July 2003.
According to information from the Medical Board of
California, Ibrahim was terminated from the prison, but later was
allowed to resign as part of a settlement of his personnel case. The
prison employs five medical doctors and eight psychiatrists, a
prison spokesman said.
The
medical board accused Ibrahim of touching or grabbing the breasts of
two female inmates who had come to him for treatment of asthma and
high blood pressure.
Ibrahim
also was accused of unprofessional conduct such as using profanity
and making sexually suggestive comments while talking with inmates
and staff, according to state records.
Neither
Ibrahim, whose suspension began in early September, nor his
Santa
Monica attorney returned phone calls seeking
comment.
State
Prison Health System
California's prison health system
has been under fire for years because of allegations about shoddy
care, patient neglect, filthy examination rooms, careless
procedures, overworked staff and bottom-of-the-barrel physician
hires.
By the
prison system's own account, about 20 percent of its doctors have
some kind of blemish on their records, such as a malpractice
lawsuit, criminal charges or privileges revoked by a hospital.
A
federal judge in July ordered that a receiver be appointed to run
the prison health system after the state failed to make promised
improvements.
ANOTHER PHYSICIAN ACCUSED AND
DISCIPLINED
Facing a formal
Accusation of unprofessional conduct before the Medical Board of
California, Fullerton physician Harley Sterling, M.D. has
surrendered his license to practice medicine. The stipulated
surrender of his medical license was accepted by the board on March
14, 2005 and became effective on March 21, 2005.
In a November 1999 First Amended Accusation, the
board accused Sterling of violating multiple sections of the
Business and Professions Code, including section 2234(b)(c) (d)
(gross negligence, repeated negligent acts, and incompetence) in his
care and treatment of two patients. One patient, while under his
care, underwent approximately 32 procedures on her breasts. During
all surgical procedures performed which involved injection of saline
or silicone gel into intact breast implants, Sterling directly
punctured with a syringe needle the outer shell of the silicone
implants, thereby causing leakage of implant material into the
surrounding tissue. He also augmented the volume of the implants
with saline or silicone gel, although it was never intended by
implant manufacturers and was clearly prohibited by the federal Food
and Drug Administration. On a second patient, Sterling used a
homemade "nutcracker" device (consisting of two ax handles connected
by a small metal bar at the top) to perform a closed capsulotomy.
This procedure is commonly performed to breakup the fibrous scar
capsule around the implant. Sterling failed to explain to the
patient the potential risks and complications from using the device,
did not obtain verbal or written approval from the patient, and
failed to provide appropriate follow-up care to ensure no
complications occurred from using this device.
Pursuant to a Stipulated Settlement and
Disciplinary Order in May 2000, the board placed Sterling on five
years' probation for unprofessional conduct. During the term of
probation, he was required to comply with the board's Probation
Surveillance Program along with terms and conditions, some of which
included: enrolling in and completing the full Physician Assessment
and Clinical Education Program (PACE) at the University of
California, San Diego School of Medicine and undergo assessment,
clinical training and examination with a focus, where possible, on
plastic and reconstructive surgery, within 90 days; on an annual
basis thereafter for each year of probation, submitting to the board
an educational program or course not less than 40 hours per year;
enrolling and passing a board-approved ethics course; having a
practice monitor for the first two years of probation; obeying all
federal, state and local laws, all rules governing the practice of
medicine in California, and remaining in full compliance with any
court-ordered criminal probation, payments and orders; submitting
quarterly reports advising of his compliance with his probation and
any court-ordered probation; and appearing in person for interviews
with the board.
Sterling's probation was subject to revocation for
failing to obey all laws, submit quarterly reports to the board, pay
cost recovery to the board for investigative and prosecution costs
as well as the costs associated with probation monitoring. In
addition, Sterling was subject to discipline for performing
surgeries in an outpatient center without a transfer agreement and
without admitting privileges at a local licensed acute care
hospital. According to Sterling's own surgical records, he performed
over 100 surgical procedures in his outpatient surgery center
between January 6, 2003 and August 26, 2003 without the required
transfer arrangement and without the required liability insurance
coverage for malpractice claims.
CALIFORNIA DOCTOR SURRENDERED
MEDICAL LICENSE
Facing formal
Accusations of wrongdoing by the Medical Board of California, San
Diego physician Egisto Salerno, M.D. has surrendered his license to
practice medicine. The stipulated surrender of his medical license
is effective on April 29, 2003.
Salerno was placed by the Medical Board on two
years' probation beginning June 18, 2001 for an assessment and plan
for a patient inconsistent with the patient's records, which he had
not signed; for inadequate follow-up with the patient; for not being
truthful at his interviews with Medical Board staff; and because he
admitted to lying to the city attorney and to the police who were
investigating the patient.
On April 22, 2002 Salerno was arrested for being
under the influence of cocaine; chasing non-existent people with a
loaded weapon and threatening to kill his wife. When arrested, he
had a baggie of cocaine in his underwear, and additional cocaine and
marijuana were found in other places in his home. He admitted to
using the cocaine that day. Police officers also found numerous
unregistered weapons and 300 rounds of ammunition in his home.
As a result of the felony charges stemming from
Salerno's arrest, on May 22, 2002 he agreed with the Board to accept
a full temporary restraining order that prohibited him from any
medical practice. The Board filed an Accusation and Petition to
Revoke his probation on June 13, 2002. His surrender of his medical
license constitutes the conclusion of this case.
LICENSED TO KILL
A man currently serving a 12?-year sentence
for impersonating a physician was sentenced this morning to an
additional 120 months in federal prison for posing as a doctor after
escaping from prison in 2000.
Gerald Barnes, 70, was
sentenced on his fifth conviction of impersonating a doctor. The
10-year sentence imposed by United States District Judge J. Spencer
Letts in Los Angeles will run consecutive to both the 12?-year
sentence and a separate, previously imposed 2?-year sentence for the
escape. The prior sentences are not due to expire until June
2009.
Barnes, who was born Gerald Barnbaum, claims to have
legally changed his name in the 1970s to Gerald Barnes, the name of
a licensed physician who was practicing in Stockton, California.
After obtaining copies of Dr. Barnes' school records and medical
credentials, the fake Dr. Barnes used the documents to obtain
employment at numerous medical clinics and offices in Southern
California.
As part of today's sentencing, Judge Letts
ordered the defendant to stop using the name of Gerald Barnes,
finding no evidence that the defendant had ever legally adopted that
name.
Barnes pleaded guilty in 1981 to involuntary
manslaughter in connection with the death of a 29-year-old patient
who died of complications from diabetes after being misdiagnosed by
Barnes. He was convicted again in 1984 and 1989 on state charges of
grand theft and writing fraudulent prescriptions. Upon each release
from prison, Barnes resumed his impersonation of Dr.
Barnes.
PHYSICIAN IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW MAY BE
SENTENCED TO 598 YEARS IN PRISON 2/10/05
The federal jury convicted Dr. Rafil Dhafir of conspiring to
violate the embargo, money laundering, tax evasion and Medicare
fraud after a trial that lasted more than three months. Dhafir, an
oncologist, was acquitted on one of the 11 counts of money
laundering.
Defense attorney Deveraux Cannick said Dhafir was the victim of
post-Sept. 11 anti-Muslim sentiment. "If he were not a Muslim, he
never would have been charged or brought to trial," the attorney
said.
Dhafir founded Help The Needy in 1995 and solicited donations to
help starving and oppressed Iraqis. The charity was never properly
licensed, and the government says only about $160,000 made it to
Iraq (news - web sites).
The government says the charity transferred nearly $4 million
from its U.S. bank accounts to a bank in Jordan under the name of
Maher Zagha, one of the Help the Needy members charged with Dhafir.
Zagha remains a fugitive.
The government said Dhafir defrauded donors by using $544,000 for
his own purposes, including buying two coin-operated laundries, and
he evaded taxes by writing off the charity's donations.
His defense attorneys argued that Dhafir believed humanitarian
aid to Iraq was legal, and that while he mixed charity money with
his own, he never used donations for personal expenses.
The attorneys also said Dhafir got caught up in difficult rules
governing Medicare and his mistakes were not crimes.
Dhafir was arrested in February 2003 in a high-profile raid at
his home and labeled a suspected terrorist by U.S. Attorney General
John Ashcroft (news - web sites). The government later backed
away from that claim but kept Dhafir imprisoned for more than 20
months while awaiting trial.
Five people, including Dhafir's wife, have pleaded guilty to
charges related to the case.
Dhafir, 57, will be sentenced June 20. If given the maximum
penalty on each count, Dhafir would face up to 598 years in prison
and fines totaling $23.5 million.
Former Clinic
CEO Sentenced for Tax Evasion On December 17,
US Attorney McGregor W. Scott announced that Osa Marie Healy, was
sentenced to a one year and one day jail term for filing false tax
returns which falsely omitted some $90,000 of income which she had
embezzled from the Redwood Family Clinic, a Vallejo-based health
care clinic.
Former
Administrator Charged with Fraud On December
15, the US Attorney's Office for the Northern District of California
announced that a federal grand jury in San Jose has indicted Neil
Philip McArthur on three counts of Medicare fraud. Mr. McArthur was
charged with defrauding Medicare of over $800,000 between January 1,
1998 and January 10, 2000. During this time, he was employed by the
Monterey Family Practice Medical Center (MFP) and Alpha Healthcare
Management Services (Alpha) in Monterey, California. McArthur is
charged with 1) conspiracy to commit health care fraud, 2) health
care fraud, and 3) making a false statement pertaining to health
care fraud.
Yedid
Confined On November 24, US
Attorney for the Southern District of California Carol C. Lam
announced that Dr. Joseph Yedid, a San Diego psychologist, was
sentenced to six months of home confinement, 250 hours of community
service, and three years of supervised release, as well as pay at
$10,000 fine and over $37,000 restitution for submitting false
billings to Medicare.
FL Pain Clinic
Manager Charged On December 13, US Attorney
for the Southern District of Florida Marcos Daniel Jiménez and
Robert J. Joura, Acting Special Agent in Charge, United States Drug
Enforcement Administration, announced the recent filing of criminal
charges against defendant, Mark Gusow, related to a conspiracy to
distribute and dispense Oxycodone, including OxyContin, through the
Boca Raton Community Pain Center.
Med-Con Owner
Sentenced On December 15, US Attorney for
the Eastern District of Kentucky, Gregory F. Van Tatenhove,
announced that John Shaw, the owner and operator of Med-Con, an
oxygen supply business which receives payments from Medicare for
furnishing oxygen to approved patients, was sentenced to a period of
six months home confinement, and ordered to pay restitution in the
sum of $354,000 to Medicare.
In September of 2004, Mr. Shaw entered a plea of
guilty to ten counts of making kickbacks to a doctor and two of his
associates for falsifying oxygen tests results on patients and for
referring those same patients to Med-Con, John Shaw's business. The
doctor, who is no longer in practice, maintained an office in
Martin, Kentucky. During 2000 and 2001, the kickbacks totaled
$73,130.00.
Pair Charged
with Fraud On December 15, US Attorney
Michael Shelby announced the indictment of Brenda Franklin Harris,
58, and Rosalind Michelle Jones, 38, of Baytown, Texas, the owners
of Health Universal Medical Services. They are charged with
conspiracy, wire fraud, and health care fraud as a result of a
scheme to defraud Medicare of millions of dollars by filing false
and fraudulent claims.
TX Cardiologist
Indicted On December 16, US Attorney for the
Western District of Texas Johnny Sutton announced the arrest and
indictment of Dr. Piyush V. Patel, a cardiologist and owner of Heart
Place Hospital in Midland and his wife, Dr. Meenakshi P. Patel, a
Midland psychiatrist, for conspiring to defraud Medicare, Medicaid,
and Federal Employees Health Benefit
Plan.
Disciplinary News by AP
Oakland,
California-AP -- A California doctor who's written 75-hundred
recommendations for medical use of marijuana could be in
trouble.
The
Medical Board of California is trying to revoke or suspend Doctor
Tod Mikuriya's (mee-koo-REE'-yuhz) license.
The
licensing board says the issue is not pot itself -- but rather
making the recommendation without doing sufficient medical exams or
keeping proper records.
Mikuriya
has been a vocal advocate of medical marijuana for years. He and his
supporters view the accusation as a political attempt to silence
him. One says it's all having a "chilling" effect.
Doctors
are allowed to recommend marijuana in Alaska, Arizona, California,
Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Nevada, Oregon and Washington.
The Bush
administration is aiming to smoke out doctors who recommend pot and
have them punished.
310.804.5225
British American Legal
Council.
|