|
A LAWYER WHO IS A DOUBLE BOARD
CERTIFIED PHYSICIAN COULD BEST DIAGNOSE YOUR LEGAL ISSUES WITH A
MEDICALLY ORIENTED MIND. A REGULAR LAWYER HAS NOT GONE THROUGH THE
MEDICAL SCHOOL PAIN, RESIDENCY TRAINING AND ONCALL NIGHTS, AND
HAS NOT TAKEN THE PAINSTAKING MEDICAL BOARD EXAMINATIONS. WE
HAVE SEEN IT ALL AND FEEL YOUR PAIN. WE KNOW HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT LAW
AND LAWYERS, MEDICARE AND INSURANCE COMPANY NONESENSE, DIVORCE AND
LOSS OF YOUR CHILDREN, AND WE KNOW YOU ARE SICK AND TIRED OF MEDICAL
BOARDS AND HOSPITAL PROBLEMS. WE KNOW YOU ARE BUSY, YOU DO NOT HAVE
TIME TO DEAL WITH LEGAL LETTERS, PAPERS FROM COURTS AND LAWYERS,
LETTERS FROM MEDICAL BOARDS AND INSURANCE COMPANIES. LEAVE IT TO US;
WE ARE DOCTORS FOR DOCTORS. 310.804.5225
New Rules For Hospital
Dumping The Centers for Medicare
and Medicaid Services recently made some changes to the Emergency
Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) regulations. The new regulations,
which took effect October 1, clarify that all hospitals, even
specialty hospitals without emergency departments, must accept
patient transfers from other hospitals as required by
EMTALA
EMTALA was
passed by Congress in 1986 in response to widespread concerns that
hospitals were turning away or transferring patients who were in
need of emergency medical care but unable to pay for those services.
The law requires hospitals with emergency rooms to provide emergency
medical services to anyone regardless of ability to pay. The law
also requires hospitals to accept transfers from another hospital’s
emergency department if it is within the capability of the facility.
Previously, it was unclear whether specialty hospitals without
emergency departments were required to accept patient transfers from
other hospitals’ emergency rooms.
The
new regulations also authorize nurse-midwives and other qualified
personnel acting within their legally authorized scope of practice
to certify false labor. Previously, the EMTALA regulations required
a physician to certify that a woman was not in “true”
labor.
Doctor-Assisted Suicide
Legislation Blocked in California By Sarah
Larkins CNSNews.com Correspondent (Update: A bill to
legalize physician-assisted suicide in California was rejected by
the State Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday. This is the fourth
time an assisted suicide measure has failed to advance in
California. The Los Angeles Times reported that a single senator - a
Democrat -- cast the deciding vote against the
measure.)
(CNSNews.com) - Legislation to legalize
doctor-assisted suicide in California is headed for an important
test in the state Senate Judiciary Committee, but opponents amassing
on Tuesday at the state capitol said they were confident the bill
would eventually be defeated even if it cleared the
committee.
Californians Against Assisted Suicide (CAAS)
organized disability rights advocates, hospice officials, the
California League of United Latin American Citizens and others to
show the diversity of the opposition to the bill.
"We're
cautiously optimistic," CAAS spokesperson Tim Rosales told Cybercast
News Service. "No matter what happens, we think that we have the
votes to stop this in the legislature in
California."
Assembly Bill 651, known as the California
Compassionate Choices Act, would allow terminally ill patients to
request a prescription to end their lives.
"[The bill]
fundamentally changes the relationship between doctors and
patients," Rosales argued. "For thousands of years, doctors have
been in the position of doing no harm, of helping patients. This
would, for the first time in California, really redefine that
relationship and would allow doctors to prescribe a lethal dose of
drugs for the only purpose of ... committing
suicide."
However, Democratic Assemblywoman Patty Berg
referred to the legislation as a "peace of mind" issue.
"It's
an individual saying, 'I've come to the end, and I don't want to
continue living in the state I'm in and going through this
process,'" Berg said in June, according to the San Jose Mercury
News.
Berg and fellow Democratic Assemblyman Lloyd Devine
first introduced the bill in 2005. After stalling in the Assembly,
provisions for physician-assisted suicide were added to another bill
that was awaiting action in the Senate.
The bill previously
failed to collect even half of the 40 votes needed in the Assembly,
which bodes trouble for the current effort to pass it, Rosales
said.
However, Robert Kenneth, communications director for
the Death with Dignity National Center in Portland, Ore.,
disagreed.
"We're hopeful and optimistic that it will be
voted out of the Judiciary Committee and move on to a full Senate
vote relatively quickly," Kenneth told Cybercast News
Service.
In 1997, Oregon became the first, and is still the
only state to legalize physician-aided suicides. According to the
Oregon Department of Human Service's eighth annual report on the
law, 246 patients have taken medications to end their lives in the
past eight years since the law's implementation.
Physician-assisted suicide differs from euthanasia in that
it does not allow physicians to administer life-ending medication,
only to prescribe it. Patients must administer the medication
themselves.
California's bill, modeled after the Oregon law,
would apply to patients who have been diagnosed with a terminal
illness and told that they have six months or fewer to live, and who
are mentally competent to make and communicate health care
decisions. The attending physician and a consulting physician would
determine whether these criteria were fulfilled.
"Technically
speaking, physician-assisted dying is painfully specific," Kenneth
said. "It's only for people who are already dying of a terminal
illness, and they just want to have control over those final hours
and final days. Otherwise, wracked with pain and loss of bowel and
bladder control, it's just an agonizing, terrible
process."
According to the bill, doctors would be able to
request a psychological evaluation if they believed a patient was
suffering from a psychiatric or psychological disorder caused by
either depression or medication.
The bill lists other
safeguards, including that a doctor must provide alternative options
such as hospice care and that a patient must make both a written and
an oral request, which must be reiterated within 15 days of the
first oral request.
Rosales argued, however, that such
safeguards do not address other troubling aspects of the
legislation.
"The safeguards ... do nothing to prevent
doctor shopping, so even if they get turned down by one doctor they
can shop until they find a doctor that will prescribe," he said.
"Whether you are a doctor of dermatology or a doctor of oncology,
you can prescribe this. In cases like Oregon, you have doctors who
have done this without even seeing a patient one time ... There are
many loopholes."
In a May 2006 Gallup poll, 69 percent of
Americans polled said they supported the concept of doctor-assisted
suicide.
"Generally speaking, polls continue to show, quarter
after quarter, year after year, that the majority of Americans want
to have control at the end of life when they're facing a terminal
illness," Kenneth said.
Polls such as this are not an
accurate predictor of the bill's fate, however, Rosales
said.
"Depending upon how the question is asked, Americans
have generally said that they're supportive of this kind of thing,"
he said. "However ... [the issue] always fails. It failed last year
in California ... it has failed in states like Vermont, Hawaii,
[and] Arizona."
This issue will prove to be an important one
that cuts across political lines, Kenneth said.
"We all face
this issue, either with loved ones, parents, grandparents, or when
we face it ourselves. This is an issue that touches every human
being," he said. "It's basically a common sense issue for people to
make up their own
minds."
Celebrity Doctor lost
license
Patients' new approach to
high cost of Medical care
The 46-year-old woman, who has been
identified only by her initials AM, slipped out of her hospital bed
following the surgery and disappeared.
Doctors at the clinic in Rome say that
apart from the unpaid bill they are also concerned for her health as
she requires close monitoring following the surgery.
Dr Jamal Salhi said: "She told me that
she needed the surgery because she worked in a hostess bar and that
clients preferred big chested women.
"She went from a size four to a size
eight which is the largest you can get in Italy. When she came to my
surgery she said: "I want the biggest chest possible."
"'It has since emerged that she gave
false information when she arrived at the clinic and apart from
running off without paying, as with any surgery she needs to be
monitored afterwards."
Dr Salhi then revealed it was not the
first time he had been the victim of a fraudster. He said: "This has
happened to me several times before, the most recent was last
December.
"A man had a penis enlargement and
disappeared without paying. We still have to be paid for that
operation."
Police spokesman Adriano Lauro said: "We
have issued a warrant for the woman's arrest and also one for her
husband following the complaint from the clinic."
Fertility Doctor
Disciplined
The Medical Board of California
has revoked the license of a fertility doctor who implanted the
wrong embryos in a woman and didn't tell her for 18 months.
The license of Doctor Steven
Katz was pulled after the medical board concluded he engaged in what
board members termed -- "some of the most serious physician
misconduct imaginable."
Katz, who operates Fertility
Associates of the Bay Area, has admitted that he did not tell Susan
Buchweitz of Campbell he had mistakenly implanted embryos in her
womb that were intended for another woman.
Katz finally revealed his
mistake to Buchweitz and the other woman about the same time the
medical board was about to reveal the mix-up.
By then, the baby Buchweitz had
given birth to was ten months old.
Katz has until April 27th to
appeal the decision in Superior Court. He can also seek a stay that
would allow him to continue operating his practice.
Meanwhile, Buchweitz and the
other woman are involved in an ongoing custody dispute.
Kaiser
Permanente Doctor as AMA President
Michael Sexton, M.D.,
took the helm of the association, which represents many, but far
from all of the state's physicians, at the conclusion of the group's
annual House of Delegates. Sexton, 58, is board certified in
emergency medicine and has been a member of Kaiser's Permanente
Medical Group for 30 years.
Jack Lewin, M.D., its
longtime CEO, continues to run the organization, which represents
about 35,000 California physicians, on a day-to-day basis.
An emergency physician on
the medical staff at the Kaiser Foundation Hospital in San Rafael,
Sexton is the first Permanente physician elected to head the CMA,
which in an earlier era looked down on Kaiser doctors as advocates
of "socialized medicine" or worse. But those days are long gone, and
Kaiser physicians now make up 11.4 percent of its membership.
Sexton headed the
emergency department at Kaiser San Rafael from 1977 to 1983 and
presided over its medical staff from 1979 to 1981. He has been
active in local, state and national medical societies for more than
30 years, serving as chair and vice chair of the CMA's Board of
Trustees and as president of the Marin Medical Society. He has been
a member of the CMA board for 11 years.
In a March 20 address to
the House of Delegates' 700 members, Sexton called on the CMA to
take an aggressive role in championing health-care reform in
California, CMA officials said, arguing that "crushing economic
pressures, confusion surrounding quality and the crippling numbers
of the uninsured demand that the physicians of the CMA lead
California to a better place for our patients."
Still to be seen: How much
actual clout Sexton will have in his new role, which has often been
more ceremonial than not.
Contact: doctor@lawprn.com
MDCHRONICLE IS YOUR
LEGAL SUPPORT TO PRACTICE A SAFE MEDICINE
|